Faith Works 10-18-24
Jeff Gill
A landscape of departures and arrivals
___
We are coming into the peak of both fall, and election season.
Election Day itself is Nov. 5 but a startling number of voters have shown a preference in recent years for getting it over with early, for whatever reasons, and early voting is likely to encompass two-thirds of the total 100,000 or so ballots cast in Licking County.
November 1 is All Saints Day in many Christian traditions, often observed on the first Sunday in November which would be Nov. 3 this year. That means we will (technically, at least) be thinking about saints before we do our voting.
Saints, the honored dead, are of course part of the seasonal round with the eve of All Saints, or All Hallows as the early English said, being on our cultural calendar as Hallowe'en (the apostrophe being your call, stylebook-wise). Secular Halloween acknowledges the change of season and the shortening of days, chill in the air and leaves crunching underfoot, and I don't have to tell you that the acknowledgement or even enthusiastic endorsement of death is part of "secular" spooky season.
It's hard not to think about death with shadows getting longer, and winter approaching, but All Saints as opposed to the eve of is something more to do with Chesterton's "democracy of the dead." His mediation on capital-T Tradition included the voice of those who have gone before, a not inconsiderable number of souls, who may know things we do not entirely understand, hence "the democracy of the dead."
We can get caught up, politically and socially, with the idea that the future is always new, and things are always going to get better, but history and tradition and the saints who have gone before bear witness to the reality that in many ways "there is nothing new under the sun" (that's not from Chesterton). The past may have something to teach us, and it certainly helped make us and shape us, for ill perhaps in some ways, but often for good.
Hence the role of saints.
Whether your faith tradition observes a formal process of canonization, or if you simply mark any believer's passing as a promotion into the ranks of the saints, this is a good time of year to reflect on the saints who have shaped your life, and even your community's life. Founders and builders and grandparents and caregivers, parents and family, friends and mentors. You don't have to be all that old to come to a point when you realize a number of your guideposts in life have "gone on before" as the hymn sings, and you might just have advocates in heaven.
A few of my friends and mentors have died in this last year, not to mention some close relatives by marriage. I've been wrestling with two different cemeteries in the last year to get markers erected for those who have passed, and in a few inscriptions, for those not yet gone but getting close. It's a bracing experience, the story of "the dash" and all that. My initial engraving is 1961, and the second number… who knows?
But I'm in this realm of thought less to confront my own death than my personal relationships with those who have already died, for whom many questions are answered, and whose support and encouragement and guidance is still active in my life. How is it active? That becomes an interesting theological question; some might say it's more psychological, but as Prof. Dumbledore would add, that doesn't make it any less real.
"For all the saints, who from their labors rest": to this group we present our living work, our choices, even our voting, and listen for their response. Can you hear it?
Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller, and preacher in central Ohio; he's listening to what this season has to say. Tell him what you hear at knapsack77@gmail.com, or follow @Knapsack77 on Threads.
Saturday, October 12, 2024
Notes From my Knapsack 10-24-24
Notes From my Knapsack 10-24-24
Jeff Gill
Local considerations, wider implications
___
Granville had a library before there were streets or a complete survey.
The pioneer settlers of 1805 formed a church in Massachusetts before they ever got here in late November, but by 1806 the interest in a library proceeded schools or banks or even much government to speak of.
The library charter, in fact, was leveraged to get a bank started, which is part of why we have the Granville Historical Society building, standing on Broadway since 1816. Today's Granville Public Library building is historic itself, now 100 years old with a Frank Packard design completed by his firm after his untimely 1923 death.
In all the attention to national politics on TV news and across social media, we run the risk of overlooking the sort of electoral decisions that have an immediate impact on our lives. Not just the voting, as we do every two years, for our U.S. House of Representatives occupant, but for Statehouse officials representing us, like the State Senate and State Representative. We have three seats on the Ohio Supreme Court up for ballot, along with two Licking County commissioner spots.
There are lots of uncontested seats on the ballot for county government, which I really dislike seeing, which is not to voice anything against those running unopposed. Sometimes that's a sign you're doing such a good job the opposition gracefully declines to dispute the position, but seeing seven or eight slots in a row with a single candidate is not a good sign for loyal opposition, in any electoral situation.
We are being asked to voice our opinion, which will have a weighty implication in practical terms, for the ongoing property tax levies to support the countywide senior citizens services programs, and to continue and slightly increase the Granville Public Library support, as the latter is trying to prepare to serve a wider audience as their service area covers not just the village but the entire school district. More residents in Granville South means more potential customers and needs in that growing area.
There are also two opportunities to weigh in on village governance, with charter amendments needing your approval, or not happening if you do not. Small matters, perhaps, but with a very direct impact on your life, and not something you'll hear much about on cable news.
Personally, I have opinions on almost all of these matters. Ask me personally, and I'm happy to share them. But this column isn't to exhort you to vote one way or another on any of them: it's to remind you that this is where the rubber of democracy meets the road of governance. Who reviews zoning variances, or state funding for school districts, or presides over drug court: you decide, at least in part. Will we expand service of library programming? That's pretty much entirely up to you; likewise, you could throttle senior services back considerably. Your call.
Foreign policy? I'm not sure your vote on top of the ticket matters will sway that a great deal (reasonable minds may vary on that, but you see my point). But county level policy is something you can influence, quite directly.
Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller, and preacher in central Ohio; he has his ballot in mind, but hopes to vote in person on Nov. 5. Tell him your political philosophy at knapsack77@gmail.com, or follow @Knapsack77 on Twitter.
Jeff Gill
Local considerations, wider implications
___
Granville had a library before there were streets or a complete survey.
The pioneer settlers of 1805 formed a church in Massachusetts before they ever got here in late November, but by 1806 the interest in a library proceeded schools or banks or even much government to speak of.
The library charter, in fact, was leveraged to get a bank started, which is part of why we have the Granville Historical Society building, standing on Broadway since 1816. Today's Granville Public Library building is historic itself, now 100 years old with a Frank Packard design completed by his firm after his untimely 1923 death.
In all the attention to national politics on TV news and across social media, we run the risk of overlooking the sort of electoral decisions that have an immediate impact on our lives. Not just the voting, as we do every two years, for our U.S. House of Representatives occupant, but for Statehouse officials representing us, like the State Senate and State Representative. We have three seats on the Ohio Supreme Court up for ballot, along with two Licking County commissioner spots.
There are lots of uncontested seats on the ballot for county government, which I really dislike seeing, which is not to voice anything against those running unopposed. Sometimes that's a sign you're doing such a good job the opposition gracefully declines to dispute the position, but seeing seven or eight slots in a row with a single candidate is not a good sign for loyal opposition, in any electoral situation.
We are being asked to voice our opinion, which will have a weighty implication in practical terms, for the ongoing property tax levies to support the countywide senior citizens services programs, and to continue and slightly increase the Granville Public Library support, as the latter is trying to prepare to serve a wider audience as their service area covers not just the village but the entire school district. More residents in Granville South means more potential customers and needs in that growing area.
There are also two opportunities to weigh in on village governance, with charter amendments needing your approval, or not happening if you do not. Small matters, perhaps, but with a very direct impact on your life, and not something you'll hear much about on cable news.
Personally, I have opinions on almost all of these matters. Ask me personally, and I'm happy to share them. But this column isn't to exhort you to vote one way or another on any of them: it's to remind you that this is where the rubber of democracy meets the road of governance. Who reviews zoning variances, or state funding for school districts, or presides over drug court: you decide, at least in part. Will we expand service of library programming? That's pretty much entirely up to you; likewise, you could throttle senior services back considerably. Your call.
Foreign policy? I'm not sure your vote on top of the ticket matters will sway that a great deal (reasonable minds may vary on that, but you see my point). But county level policy is something you can influence, quite directly.
Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller, and preacher in central Ohio; he has his ballot in mind, but hopes to vote in person on Nov. 5. Tell him your political philosophy at knapsack77@gmail.com, or follow @Knapsack77 on Twitter.
Monday, October 07, 2024
Faith Works 10-11-24
Faith Works 10-11-24
Jeff Gill
Religious politics across a wide spectrum
___
Religious exhortations to support one candidate or another are nothing new.
Faith communities have goals and priorities for both their own common life, and for what many Christians call "missions," or outreach, which are their personal and congregational intentions for the wider community.
Any group, however organized, that has goals for their wider community is going to be bumping up against political agendas. That's politics in a nutshell: how we organize our common life. You can have our life in community organized by a king or queen, and that's a monarchy. You can end up, intentionally or not, with a very small group of people making all the key decisions, and that's an oligarchy.
As is pretty well known, the origin of what we call democracy in ancient Greece was letting the "demos," the people vote as a group on how the community would be governed, but that demos wasn't too democratic by our standards today: it was free adult male citizens who had been through basic military training, so about 10% of the population in Athens some 2,500 years ago.
Early American democracy had the same shortcoming: free white male property owners had the right to vote. So it was more inclusive than a monarchy or oligarchy, but still fairly limited. Come women's suffrage into the 1920s and the civil rights movement into the 1960s, American democracy is wider and more diverse than almost any broad-based democratic polity.
Within that large and diverse electorate, you end up with a wide range of religious perspectives. Under "free white male property-owners" type democracy, you had a relatively limited range of religious perspective, and most of it Christian and broadly Protestant. Expand that population of politically engaged citizens, you radically increase the variety of faith perspectives.
Sure, there are now church-based groups out there who are in favor of oligarchy, with them inside the select governing coalition, and there are Christian anarchists out there, too. We now have a rich, complex, even bewildering range of attitudes towards how a person of faith should look at political life, and while it can be confusing, I think it's better than having a handful of church traditions in the driver's seat.
Some belief systems actually opt out, and tell believers not to vote as an unjustifiable entanglement with worldly matters. I don't hear folks worry about that stance as much as there's loud concern about a congregation or preacher who tells their adherents how to vote. That's not how I roll, but the American experiment is not that churches can't tell people for whom to vote, but that you can't be expected to hold a particular religious belief in order to vote, let alone to hold office. Religious tests for being a political candidate were a real thing until relatively recently in much of Europe, and still exists in parts of the world (whether Communism is a religion I will leave for another day). Our Constitutional democracy says "nope" to that idea.
Jesus, who is the benchmark for most Christians in most matters, said "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's." That was in a dispute over taxes, akin to the example about voting: some religious leaders said paying taxes was too much involvement in secular matters for the truly faithful. Jesus seemed to see a space for politics, but one that should be kept alongside of one's faith, without tangling them up too much.
When challenged with what Herod Antipas was saying, Jesus replied "you tell that fox" he was going to do what he was sent here to do, regardless of political opposition. Strong words, clear distinctions. Calling the ruling authority a "bottom feeding unclean parasite" is not political, but it's pretty challenging to the politics of his day.
And with Pilate, the chief magistrate, Jesus simply kept turning his own words back to him, asking for honest consideration. Political speech, or powerful preaching?
Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller, and preacher in central Ohio; he's interested in what Jesus is saying in almost any sphere of life. Tell him how you decide your political positions at knapsack77@gmail.com or follow @Knapsack77 on Threads.
Jeff Gill
Religious politics across a wide spectrum
___
Religious exhortations to support one candidate or another are nothing new.
Faith communities have goals and priorities for both their own common life, and for what many Christians call "missions," or outreach, which are their personal and congregational intentions for the wider community.
Any group, however organized, that has goals for their wider community is going to be bumping up against political agendas. That's politics in a nutshell: how we organize our common life. You can have our life in community organized by a king or queen, and that's a monarchy. You can end up, intentionally or not, with a very small group of people making all the key decisions, and that's an oligarchy.
As is pretty well known, the origin of what we call democracy in ancient Greece was letting the "demos," the people vote as a group on how the community would be governed, but that demos wasn't too democratic by our standards today: it was free adult male citizens who had been through basic military training, so about 10% of the population in Athens some 2,500 years ago.
Early American democracy had the same shortcoming: free white male property owners had the right to vote. So it was more inclusive than a monarchy or oligarchy, but still fairly limited. Come women's suffrage into the 1920s and the civil rights movement into the 1960s, American democracy is wider and more diverse than almost any broad-based democratic polity.
Within that large and diverse electorate, you end up with a wide range of religious perspectives. Under "free white male property-owners" type democracy, you had a relatively limited range of religious perspective, and most of it Christian and broadly Protestant. Expand that population of politically engaged citizens, you radically increase the variety of faith perspectives.
Sure, there are now church-based groups out there who are in favor of oligarchy, with them inside the select governing coalition, and there are Christian anarchists out there, too. We now have a rich, complex, even bewildering range of attitudes towards how a person of faith should look at political life, and while it can be confusing, I think it's better than having a handful of church traditions in the driver's seat.
Some belief systems actually opt out, and tell believers not to vote as an unjustifiable entanglement with worldly matters. I don't hear folks worry about that stance as much as there's loud concern about a congregation or preacher who tells their adherents how to vote. That's not how I roll, but the American experiment is not that churches can't tell people for whom to vote, but that you can't be expected to hold a particular religious belief in order to vote, let alone to hold office. Religious tests for being a political candidate were a real thing until relatively recently in much of Europe, and still exists in parts of the world (whether Communism is a religion I will leave for another day). Our Constitutional democracy says "nope" to that idea.
Jesus, who is the benchmark for most Christians in most matters, said "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's." That was in a dispute over taxes, akin to the example about voting: some religious leaders said paying taxes was too much involvement in secular matters for the truly faithful. Jesus seemed to see a space for politics, but one that should be kept alongside of one's faith, without tangling them up too much.
When challenged with what Herod Antipas was saying, Jesus replied "you tell that fox" he was going to do what he was sent here to do, regardless of political opposition. Strong words, clear distinctions. Calling the ruling authority a "bottom feeding unclean parasite" is not political, but it's pretty challenging to the politics of his day.
And with Pilate, the chief magistrate, Jesus simply kept turning his own words back to him, asking for honest consideration. Political speech, or powerful preaching?
Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller, and preacher in central Ohio; he's interested in what Jesus is saying in almost any sphere of life. Tell him how you decide your political positions at knapsack77@gmail.com or follow @Knapsack77 on Threads.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
