Monday, March 16, 2026

Notes from my Knapsack 3-26-2026

Notes from my Knapsack 3-26-2026
Jeff Gill

Mrs. Martin, in her manor house thinking back
___


Victoria Claflin, child of Homer, Ohio, and honored woman in Granville as Victoria C. Woodhull, led an epic life literally from coast to coast of the United States, and in her last half-century all over Great Britain.

Her nearly fifty years a wealthy woman in the English countryside are a lesser known aspect of her story; they do play a role in why one of her all too few memorials is a marker behind the high altar of Tewkesbury Abbey, honoring her as "Victoria Woodhull Martin" as she was known in that neighborhood, whose good works went into the fabric of the massive church and to preserve the green lawns around it.

The monument includes crossed U.S. and British flags, and it hints at why her resting place is not there; she gave her daughter Zula instructions to have her body cremated after her death in 1927, to be scattered in the Atlantic midway between the two nations.

Mrs. Martin was not titled, but in her thirty years of widowhood, she lived among and entertained those who were, in London and on her Norton Park estate near Tewkesbury. Her banker husband sent many notes as he traveled for work and health before his death ended a twenty-year marriage, and almost all of them, well into their respective fifties, were signed "Your loving boy."

What clouds this last phase of her life is the passion she had for "stirpiculture," better known as human eugenics. Mrs. Martin on her estate continued to write and publish to advance this idea, that human happiness could be ensured by controlling who had children. The through line for this belief of hers is the first marriage she entered into having just turned 15 years old, and her first child, Byron, whose disabilities we do not fully understand today, but who was cognitively a child all his life, even to his death at 77.

Victoria believed that the trauma of her marriage, and her confused and unhappy relations with her husband (who by all accounts was a terrible person), were why her child had disabilities. That belief was at the heart of her "free love" declarations, rooted in the idea that happy marital relations result in happy children, and vice versa. In an era when germ theory, anesthetic in childbirth, & surgical hygiene was still all controversial, we can excuse her mistaken beliefs.

The tragedy is that this error led her further into the mistaken belief that social control of who can marry whom, and how many children each should have - including sterilization of "the unfit" - would result in contentment for all. Her arguments for eugenics are profoundly discomforting to read.

In four columns, I've barely touched on the range and scope of Victoria Woodhull's work. She deserved to be remembered for more than mistakes or the mischaracterizations of others, but living as she did in the middle of vast social tumult, her story gets caught up in many narratives. I appreciate the work of people like Mary L. Shearer in Illinois, a descendant of Victoria's second husband (whom I've barely mentioned!) who has worked hard to clear up accounts of their life together, and locally Dr. Judith Dann, a scholar of Victoria Woodhull's life, has done excellent work in print, and at public presentations.

I hope you are intrigued enough to read a bit on your own about our "Notorious Victoria," and draw your own conclusions.


Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller, and preacher in central Ohio; he's read more books about Victoria Woodhull than he can account for. Tell him what you found interesting at knapsack77@gmail.com, or follow @Knapsack on X.

Faith Works 3-20-2026

Faith Works 3-20-2026
Jeff Gill

Opening up the inbox, and taking a deep breath
___


As is so often the case, I have no one to blame but myself.

Most mornings, fairly early, I open my laptop, and toggle to the email. It is almost always a torrent, a literal steady flow down the page of new content, subscription account updates, solicitations to respond to opportunities to write about this or that.

Let's stipulate for starters that I have too many news and media sources. Given what I do here, that's no surprise (and no, I don't get free access to this paper, in print or online, that's on me). Newspapers, magazines, Substacks, online newsletters of various sorts, and while I get too many I did not ask for, it's not like the torrent would be manageable if it was just the ones I agreed to at first.

This is before I turn on the television set or open up an app on my phone, and decide which firehose of content I want to have pour out into my eyeballs. I'm just talking about my online and even email inputs.

How do I sort it out? I get asked about this fairly often, and I wish I had a better answer which I felt good about for myself, let alone to give others. There are a handful of benchmark pages and writers whom I would hasten to point out are not those I agree with — part of why I'm not going to provide a list here today — but whose perspectives seem to me to be helpful in getting a starting point in what's going on.

It won't surprise most of you to hear that's not from scanning the headlines, which I do look at on what I know many call "legacy media." That comes after a time sifting some religion content, usually tied to the Christian calendar (did you know we're in Lent? that we just passed Laetare Sunday, halfway to Easter?) as a healthy grounding. Saints days are not part of my Protestant tradition, but I like how they function as milestones, guideposts if you will, along the vast annual track we cycle through, month after month, season after season. Nothing says I can't mark saints' days, so I do.

Last week I spoke in defense of print Bibles; I support a general acknowledgment of the church calendar (without getting into peculiar debates over rules for the colors of pulpit coverings and such, which can be overdone). I'd also like to say we do well to keep our hand in with writing.

Yes, the guy who writes vast amounts of stuff on his computer keyboard, who has reached that point where he doesn't have to look at his hands to type, says we should write things down. Why? Because of the same factors that lead me to say a physical Bible is important, which have to do with memory.

And memory is not about passing tests or showing off knowledge. Your memories are in large part who you are. I've had some powerful reminders of this over the last six years. There is something powerful, and even useful, in forgetting (a subject to which I'll return), but we are also very much what we choose to remember, to hold onto, to focus on. What stories, or events, or values, do we choose to keep "front of mind"?

Online stuff is tied to (spoiler alert) algorithms and technology that helps to wipe our memories and upload new content on a regular basis. Like that firehose I confront on my computer screen most mornings. What you write down? That sticks in the brain, and somewhere deeper than neurons, I think. Notes and underlinings and scribbles in margins. Letters and journals, even. With pencil or pen, on cards or notebooks. The act of writing is a work of memory, which shapes who we are, who we become.


Jeff Gill is a writer, storyteller, and preacher in central Ohio; he carries two pens and a pocket of index cards everywhere. Tell him how you remember who you are at knapsack77@gmail.com, or follow @Knapsack on X.